Comments on: in_array() and implode() for Java http://www.leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/ Coding snippets, tutorials and procrastinations about C#, Java and Linux. Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:06:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Programming Tips : Comparing a Variable to a Number of Values | Ganda Manurung http://www.leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-6075 Programming Tips : Comparing a Variable to a Number of Values | Ganda Manurung Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:06:40 +0000 http://leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/#comment-6075 [...] in other programming language if the language doesn’t have similar function. Here is an in_array() implementation for Java. In Java, you could use any List Object such as ArrayList, Vector, HashMap or other. For C [...] [...] in other programming language if the language doesn’t have similar function. Here is an in_array() implementation for Java. In Java, you could use any List Object such as ArrayList, Vector, HashMap or other. For C [...]

]]> By: Echilon http://www.leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-5784 Echilon Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:44:35 +0000 http://leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/#comment-5784 Probably, I was new to Java when I posted this. Probably, I was new to Java when I posted this.

]]> By: fajar http://www.leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-5782 fajar Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:27:03 +0000 http://leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/#comment-5782 you can use contains method for in_array equivalent. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/util/List.html#contains(java.lang.Object) you can use contains method for in_array equivalent. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/util/List.html#contains(java.lang.Object)

]]> By: Echilon http://www.leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-5206 Echilon Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:14:49 +0000 http://leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/#comment-5206 The problem with sorting first is that you need to loop over the array twice. You might not need it sorted. The problem with sorting first is that you need to loop over the array twice. You might not need it sorted.

]]> By: Ramesh Thiruchelvam http://www.leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-5194 Ramesh Thiruchelvam Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:57:00 +0000 http://leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/#comment-5194 Java has built in functionality to search arrays using "Arrays.binarySearch", but only drawback is that the array needs be sorted before it's searched. <code> public static boolean in_array(Object needle, Object[] haystack) { Arrays.sort(haystack); return (Arrays.binarySearch(haystack, needle) >= 0); } </code> Java has built in functionality to search arrays using “Arrays.binarySearch”, but only drawback is that the array needs be sorted before it’s searched.


public static boolean in_array(Object needle, Object[] haystack) {
Arrays.sort(haystack);
return (Arrays.binarySearch(haystack, needle) >= 0);
}

]]> By: rgfdg http://www.leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-4449 rgfdg Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:32:38 +0000 http://leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/#comment-4449 You should use the StringBuilder in your implode method. You should use the StringBuilder in your implode method.

]]> By: milo http://www.leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-4434 milo Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:37:29 +0000 http://leghumped.com/blog/2007/12/20/in_array-and-implode-for-java/#comment-4434 super!!!! Really help a lot!!! super!!!! Really help a lot!!!

]]>